This blog explores both historical and current events guided by the thought of the leading thinkers, past and present, of this school or movement of theology. Refer to the Classic Posts, Great and Contemporary Thinkers, various links of all kinds, in addition to the Archives themselves. David is the founder and manager of this website, but many friends contribute to it on a regular basis.
Twitter @ressourcement
Twitter @ltdan4123
Twitter @ressourcement
Twitter @ltdan4123
Thursday, February 02, 2006
'Speeches come and go, but policies continue'
Jim Wallis
The president's State of the Union address sounded like it was cut and pasted from so many old speeches. There was nothing new last night. Easily agreed-to rhetoric about freedom, growth, opportunity, and civility hides the facts:
1. George Bush's foreign policy, and the way he fights his war on terrorism, is making our families less safe and secure, not more. His war in Iraq was based on false pretenses and has utterly failed. Yet, the president doesn't seem to have the capacity for self-examination, or the moral sense to change the nation's course.
2. George Bush's former rhetoric of compassionate conservatism has all but disappeared, and his domestic policies have clearly increased poverty in the United States. Overseas, shining promises to reduce global poverty have fallen tragically short. Last night he promised to continue down the path of moral hypocrisy with tax and spending cuts that further enrich the wealthy and impoverish the poor.
The facts of George Bush's policies undercut the moral values that many Americans, especially many of us in the religious community, hold dear. When rhetoric hides the facts, moral integrity suffers. Speeches come and go, but policies continue. And the facts of the Bush administration's policies will continue to turn true moral values voters away from this president.
Hear this commentary in streaming audio or mp3 download:
»WindowsMedia
»RealPlayer
»mp3 download
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Mr. Wallis is flat wrong on #1; on #2, "his domestic policies have clearly increased poverty" in the US is a bald assertion, and he continues the liberal trend ignoring the principle of subsidiarity in his ongoing complaint that we don't empower the federal gov't to solve each and every social problem at every level of society. Memo to Mr. Wallis: *reducing an increase* in federal spending on welfare doesn't mean the person doing to reducing isn't concerned for those who need assistance. It's really sad that this needs to be said, but apparently it does, and repeatedly so.
I think the President's policies could be better in many ways, but Wallis' views just don't accord with reality.
Chris,
I think it would be safe to say that you're not a subscriber to Sojourners. Would I be correct in this assumption? Please don't hold anything back.
Post a Comment