Paul at the blog named Communio posts the text of a recent address by Pope Benedict on Duns Scotus.
Paul significantly emphasizes a key point in the Holy Father's discussion of Scotus, the priority of practice and love over speculation in Scotus's thought:
"Thus we desire to remind scholars and everyone, believers and non-believers alike, of the path and method that Scotus followed in order to establish harmony between faith and reason, defining in this manner the nature of theology in order constantly to exalt action, influence, practice and love rather than pure speculation"
«Scotus' approach here was characteristically positive, not hypothetical. At least in the Ordinatio, his own composition, if not in the Reportationes drafted by his students, Scotus did not cast the issue in the hypothetical form in which it is often cast, 'If Adam had not sinned, would there have been an incarnation?' He remained within the actual economy of existence and of revelation (Carol 27-31; Bonnefoy, 3). The actual world which we know and inhabit, in which divine revelation is given and to which divine revelation refers, was created by God because God wanted to Son to become man and shares himself and his Father with the Holy Spirit with finite creatures, which are all spin-offs from the [I]ncarnation. Scotus here stays with what is real, attending to the origins of the existing world, not to possibilities.» (Hopkins, the Self, and God, p 108-109)
3 comments:
Thanks for an interesting post.
I don't know that scotus followed an order and method to establish the harmony between faith and reason. He just assumed it. This is far more a modern concern than a medieval one.
And despite Scotus' claim that theology is a practical science, he just happens to be one of the greatest speculative thinkers ever...I suppose it depends on what one means by 'pure' speculation. The statement seems a little ironic to me.
the great thing about a method is that it is a path that leaves a trace. So, Benedict is here describing the same path that Ong describes. I'm no Scotus scholar, but I know through others that he is brilliant and bold. As I understand it however, Scotus's students were more interested in speculation than he was — at least in the texts which survive...
Post a Comment